
There’s a quiet belief in many businesses that better systems must be more advanced.
More features.
More automation.
More complexity.
But in practice, the systems that save the most time are rarely the cleverest ones. They’re the simplest.
I see this time and again when working with small businesses and operations teams: the problem isn’t a lack of tools or technology. It’s that systems have grown more complicated than they need to be — and people are spending time managing the system, rather than doing the work or getting the benefit of automation.
Clever systems usually begin with good intentions.
A new CRM is introduced to centralise information.
A marketing tool promises to automate everything.
A spreadsheet evolves into something highly complex to cover every possible scenario thought possible.
Over time, though, complexity creeps in:
What was meant to save time starts doing the opposite.
Simple systems aren’t basic — they’re intentional and ‘designed’. Just because they are simple doesn’t mean they are limited or unsophisticated.
They’re designed around:
A simple system doesn’t try to do everything. It just does the right things.
That might mean:
Simple systems can reduce friction, whereas clever systems often add it.
Most businesses don’t set out to build complicated systems. They arrive there gradually.
Do you ever hear yourself saying things like:-
It’s all done with good intention, you want flexibility, you want to future-proof the system and avoid rework. Common causes include:
Over time, the system becomes something people work around, rather than with. That’s usually the point when productivity drops and frustration rises.
Complexity isn’t a failure — it’s a natural outcome without pausing to review and reflect.
One of the biggest benefits of simple systems is how well they support other people.
When systems are clear and straightforward:
When systems are clever but complex, knowledge stays locked with one person — often the business owner or operations lead. The person who set-up the spreadsheet or system with the intention of it saving them time. But that’s not scalable, and it’s exhausting.
A common worry is that simple systems won’t cope with growth.
In reality, simple systems are often more adaptable.
Because they’re easy to understand, they’re easier to improve, to extend, automate gradually, document and of course teach.
The most effective systems I see aren’t always finished products. They’re clear foundations that evolve as the business needs them to.
If you’re unsure whether a system is serving you well, ask:
If the answer to several of those is “no”, the issue usually isn’t effort or ability. It’s design.
And here are three questions to help you simplify your own system. Ask these next time you open ‘that’ spreadsheet or system:-
Qu 1: What am I recreating again and again?
Qu 2: Where am I the middle person?
Qu 3: Would this still make sense in six months?
But my advice, don’t do this with every system you open, start with just one.
Observation the spreadsheets that work best are usually the ones you aren’t afraid to open.
Much of my work is about helping businesses strip things back.
Not by removing value; but by removing friction.
That might mean:
The goal is always the same: Save time, reduce stress, and make systems feel supportive rather than heavy.
If a system needs constant explanation, it’s probably too clever.
The best systems fade into the background — quietly doing their job, while people get on with theirs.
Simple doesn’t mean unsophisticated, it means effective.